- April 8, 2020
Case Study Two Major Baseball League Negotiation
CaseStudy Two: Major Baseball League Negotiation
MajorBaseball League Negotiation
1a).Who Used Most Effectively?
Accordingto the outcome of the negotiations, the clubs used their power mosteffectively because they had total control over the players once theindividuals signed the contract. Moreover, the players were not paidtheir entire amounts when the leagues ended. In the negotiationsconsequently, the baseball leagues and club owners seemed to havemore control than the players did hence, they managed to achievemost of the demands they had tabled (Carney, 2015).
b).Who Had More Power in the Negotiation Setting?
Bothsides have power against each other, but the club exhibits higherauthority because it retains the most rights against the players(Crump, 2012). The first success for the leagues and clubs was thatthey had complete control over the players in their leagues andclubs. For instance, the individuals could not participate in othergames such as boxing, wrestling, football, motorcycle racing or icehockey. Secondly, the athletes have no permission to make publicinterviews or appearances on radio and television as well as sponsorany commercial product without the knowledge and consent of the club(Crump, 2012).
Onthe other hand, the players and their unions also managed to attainsome merits in the negotiations. First, they should be paidsemi-monthly once the primary season starts. However, this means thatthere will be no payment during spring training. Secondly, playersshould continue to be paid even when they are out to fulfill theirduties in the National Guard or reserves (Carney, 2015).
2).How Could The Players Benefit By Agreeing With The CongressionalThreat Of Drug Testing?
Theplayers have much to gain when they agree with the congressionalthreat of drug testing. First, the policy will ensure that onlygenuine players are in the game thus, fair competition isguaranteed. Second, drug testing will ensure that sanity is exhibitedin the baseball leagues. If the rule is not implemented, there arehigh chances of clubs encouraging doping to boost their players’performance (Carney, 2015).
3).Whatwas the intent of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act?
TheSherman Anti-Trust Act is a constitutional policy that seeks toeliminate unfair competition in any form of enterprise. The act isrelevant in MLB since it prevents teams and individual athletes touse dishonest means to dominate in their respective fields (ShermanAnti-Trust Act (1890), n.d). For example, doping, which involvesusing performance-enhancing drugs, is banned. The policy has managedto restore sanity in the baseball games by introducing regulationsthat hinder the players from doping. In the MLB, players are requiredto go through a drug test that will determine if they are usingenergy enhancers or not. Athletes found to be abusing certain drugsare suspended or banned from the games (Crump, 2012).
4).Could the Salary Cap Create a Problem for the Player’s Union?
Anothercrucial negotiation point of the stakeholders was the salaries. Theplayers managed to strike deals that saw them get paid handsomely.This included payment twice a month as long as the major league is inprogress. Moreover, both the clubs and players were comfortable withthe payment rates. Also, the players are comfortable with the paymentthey receive that means that there will be no problem with theplayer’s union (Crump, 2012).
5).Solution to Benefit both the Players and the Owners, While Satisfyingthe Fan
TheMLB is a very lucrative and competitive business. The fans play animportant role to this status. However, due to the misunderstandingsand conflicts, the supporters have lost trust in the league. To gainback the confidence of the devotees, club owners, and the playersshould always strive to resolve their problems without necessarilyexposing it to the fans. The objective can be achieved through thecreation of elaborate conflict resolution committees that would dealwith any matter that arises (MacPherson, 2016).
Inconclusion, negations are vital to the MLB. Conflicts are easilyresolved without spilling out to the fans. Clubs and players shouldhave an agreement of salaries that they should pay or get paid. Thereshould be efficient anti-doping laws that will prevent players fromusing drugs. By so doing, the baseball leagues stands a high chanceof being competitive as all athletes would depend on their naturalstrength alone.
Carney,L. J. (2015). Major league baseball`s `foul ball`: Why minor leaguebaseball players are not exempt employees under the fair laborstandards act. Journal of Corporation Law, 41(1), 283-312.Retrieved fromhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/1755426294?accountid=45049
Crump,L. (2012). For the sake of the team: Unity and disunity in amultiparty major league baseball negotiation. Negotiation Journal,21(3), 317-341. Retrieved fromhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/205185053?accountid=45049
MacPherson,B. (2016, Feb 20). MLB commissioner Rob Manfred discusses domesticviolence, free-agent compensation, designated hitter. TCA RegionalNews. Retrieved fromhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/1766953102?accountid=45049
ShermanAnti-Trust Act (1890). (n.d) Our Documents. Web. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=51