• Uncategorized

Causes of Worldwide Loss of Fisheries

CAUSES OF WORLDWIDE LOSS OF FISHERIES 8

Causesof Worldwide Loss of Fisheries

Causesof Worldwide Loss of Fisheries

Introduction:Overview of Worldwide Causes of Loss of Fisheries

Acrossthe globe billions of people rely on fishing as the sole source ofincome. According to the law of supply and demand, when the demandfor a particular commodity becomes too high, the producers will beobliged to provide just as much as is being demanded. This createsthe imprint that despite the fact that fish may be depleted fromrivers, lakes, and ponds, fishers would like to ensure that the dailyneeds of the prospective customers are met. These and other severalreasons are some of the causes of loss of fisheries in the wholeworld. Overfishing in the whole world is significantly impacted bythe lack of ideal protection in all areas of interest in theenvironment, primarily marine and freshwater life.

Backgroundof the Study

Accordingto a recent research established by World Wildlife Fund (WWF), it wasrevealed that given that the overfishing menace will keep prevailingjust as it currently is, within the next two decades or less, a largecollection of different species of fish stand a high chance of totalextinction. It is wise to note that there are more than a thousanddifferent species of fish some of which have become so rare due tofalling victim of the fierce desire of fishers to increase theireconomies of scale without the slightest regard of how the nextgeneration of fish will come to survive (Dieter, 2014).

Relevanceof the Essay

Theobjective of this article is to help pinpoint the major causes ofoverfishing in not only the United States, but also the rest of theworld as well. Reasons such as lack of ideal protection on variousparts of the environment such as marine waters and easy access tofisheries as well as illegal fishing are some of the maincontributing factors to the global issue affecting the future of allgenerations of fish. Additionally, this essay aims to enlighten theworld about some of the potential recommendations that the respectivewildlife management teams need to consider putting in place to securethe future of fish.

Argument

Thefact that most fishing organizations lack the apt security protectionagencies gives the idea that the government is too occupied withother influential matters to simply concentrate on the welfare offish. Suppose the government decided to intervene in the fishingbusiness, it may regulate the price and demand associated with fish.For example, the use of subsidies can play a huge role in tamingoverfishing throughout the entire world (Dieter, 2014).

Causesof Worldwide Loss of Fisheries

Lackof ideal environmental protection is among the biggest causes of theloss fisheries in the globe. One of the deadliest threats that alltypes of wildlife face, including all the species of fish is the lackof appropriate protection from concerned stakeholders. The WWF hastried everything within its capability to cover as large as possibleareas for the protection of wildlife, but it is prudent to take noteof the fact that some areas are simply too remote to be protected.Different fishing grounds in the world lack the required access suchas transport and communication creating the notion that protectingthat particular area will be a total impossibility.

Additionally,fisheries are depleting at a faster rate because of easily accessiblefishing grounds. In as much as different administrations all over theworld have come up with ideal strategies on how best to protect thefuture of their respective wildlife sections, there is no ruling outthe fact that some areas are far too accessible to be termed asgovernment protected (Dieter, 2014). For example, a local river mayact as the source of water of a very busy neighborhood it might looklike it is serving the people nobly. However, in a deeper look, itmay be realized that there is a group of malicious villagers who areonly out to milk the resources of the river to their selfish gains(Gilman et al., 2013).

Illegalfishing occurs when there is a particular piece of a water sourcethat has not yet been claimed by anyone so far. According to the law,a place with no authentic occupant or resident is termed as a noman’s land. In such a place, no governmental jurisdiction can applysince the land belongs to no state in the whole world. This acts asan opportunity for illegal fishers to infiltrate the ground andexploit it to the maximum of its potential. This marks the beginningof a potential doom to a good number of species of not only fish buta massive diversification of marine life.

Inappropriatefishing management causes the loss of fisheries. In an internationalpoint of view, it is wise to note that organizations like the WWF arerun by ordinary human beings who may, in one way or the other, end upintertwining the intricacies of their personal objectives to the setgoals of their respective organizations. Once this happens, anenormous taxation value can be imposed on a certain quantity of fishmaking the fishermen come up with new methods of meeting their day today needs. Once this happens, fishing goes from being a source oflivelihood to being a source of survival.

Over-depletionof a wide variety of different stocks of fish is another chief causeof this problem. At this point of the study, it has been wellestablished that there is marginalized collection of species of fishin the whole world (Lee &amp Rahimi, 2015). They are grouped intoedible and non-edible. Those that are edible are used for strictlycommercial objectives while the non-edible have numerous applicationsfor example privilege or rather enjoyment such as being stored inaquariums. In most cases, the non-edible types of fish are unique andrarely found, termed as the indigenous species.

Termsand conditions of the international fishing policies have also beennoted as contributing to the problem. As mentioned in the earliersection of this study, all the stakeholders that are concerned withthe welfare of wildlife are under the mentality that they can use thejurisdictional power of their respective occupations to further theiragendas as far as the economy is concerned. For example, in the eventof national disasters like Tsunami, most administrations all over theworld offer help to the affected parties but the type of aid given isprovided based on the objectives of the giving nations. Easy butplentiful support is what most countries go for (Lee &amp Rahimi,2015).

Furthermore,Unfavorable economic invectives have resulted in the loss offisheries. Often when the government decides to get involved with aparticular business, it uses three primary strategies. The mostcommon include the use of subsidies and incentives to ensure that theregulation of the price for particular products being offered by thatbusiness (Muir, 2011). As a result of this, the government makescertain that employment is provided to a good number of youths.Moreover, it also keeps the price in check, but the only differenceor shortcoming is the fact that after this point, the welfare of thatbusiness is left in the hands of businesspeople, who could rapidlyturn into illegal fishers.

Recommendations

IdealGovernment Involvement in business is one way to help improve thefisheries problem. In most cases, governments want to be associatedwith every future business as this will enable them to keep track ofall the potential sources of taxation and revenue. Most importantly,when the government decides to get intertwined with the personalbusinesses of entrepreneurs, all that it seeks to ascertain is theauthenticity and legality of the firm. When illegal fishers get wordof how the government has tightened the bolt in all matters relatingto fishing, the chances are that they will either fall in place orlook for other dangerous and farfetched ideas of survival.

Improvingfisheries management all across the globe might also help. One of thegreatest techniques that entrepreneurs use to enhance their economiesof scale is through employing people with the highest qualificationsand the most reliable skills and an extended duration of experienceand knowledge. Through this move, they can be sure that theenvironmental and financial future of their particular business hasbeen safeguarded using the simplest strategy ever. The same ideacould be applied to all organizations that are concerned with thegrowth and development of all types of wildlife (Telesetsky, 2014).

Expandingall protected environmental areas can safeguard the loss offisheries. It is an inarguable fact that with the daily advancementof technological matters there is placing no limit to which thecreativity of man is capable of affecting the world in a positivemanner. One of the greatest challenges that wildlife management facesis the depletion of most animal species. The government can come upwith state of the art infrastructural ideas that can see to it thateven the remotest of all places in the world have the requiredprotection. This will ensure that future generations have a place inthis world.

Educatingmasses regarding the dangers of overfishing can help in controllingthe problem. Intellectuals are well aware of the fact that whatshapes the opinion of the public is media personalities. Bearing thisin mind, the government can decide to use the impact that the mediapersonalities have in society to enlighten the world about all thefact regarding fisheries (Paulson, 2012). On the same note, mediawill take this opportunity to prevail upon society to take great careof all types of wildlife since they are more beneficial alive andkicking rather than dead and gone. The impact that social media hason the lives of modern day people cannot be underestimated.

Conclusion

Overfishingin the whole world is significantly impacted by the lack of idealprotection in all areas of interest in the environment, primarilymarine and freshwater life. To second this, consider the fact on filethat most fishing organizations lack the apt security protectionagencies gives the idea that the government is too busy occupied withother influential matters to simply concentrate on the welfare offish. Suppose the government decided to intervene in the fishingbusiness, it may regulate the price and demand associated with fish.For example, the use of subsidies can play a massive role in tamingoverfishing throughout the entire world.

WorksCited

Dieter,A. (2014). From Harbor To High Seas: An Argument For RethinkingFishery Management Systems And Multinational FishingTreaties.&nbspWisconsinInternational Law Journal,&nbsp32(4),725-751.

Gilman,E., Suuronen, P., Hall, M., &amp Kennelly, S. (2013). Causes andmethods to estimate cryptic sources of fishing mortalitya.&nbspJournalof Fish Biology,&nbsp83(4),766-803. doi:10.1111/jfb.12148

Lee,S., &amp Rahimi Midani, A. (2015). Comparison of efficiency levelsusing meta-frontier analysis of global fisheries for the period1960-2010.&nbspFisheriesScience,&nbsp81(2),247-254. doi:10.1007/s12562-014-0839-2.

Muir,D. (2011). Imaginingthe ideal pension system international perspectives: Fishing projectsin Africa. Kalamazoo,Mich.: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

Paulson,H. (2012). Sourcesof funding in fishing.New York: Business Plus.

Telesetsky,A. (2014). Laundering Fish in the Global Undercurrents: Illegal,Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing and Transnational OrganizedCrime.&nbspEcologyLaw Quarterly,&nbsp41(4),939-997.