• Uncategorized

Improving Texas Public Education



ImprovingTexas Public Education

ImprovingTexas Public Education

Backgroundof the Issue

Several problems have beset Public Education in Texas. A keychallenge afflicting the system is finance. Without a doubt, fundingis the biggest and most important attribute of any education sector.An amount close to five billion dollars was reduced from the statebudget in 2011 thereby upsetting the educational resources allocatedto most districts. For instance, the Northern Texas districts areadversely affected, for five years they have been receiving fundingthat is below their set budgets (Stuz, 2015). Several schools filed apetition protesting the reduction of public funding. Thedemonstrations paved the way for legal battles with parents going tocourt demanding to know whether the system was in tandem with theconstitution. As they continue to seek legal redress, most peoplehold the opinion that the funding of Public Education in Texas needsto be re-examined in order to come up with solutions appropriate forgrowth. Most if not all stakeholders are in agreement that for theschools and the educational sector to meet its objective, there isneed to avail more resources.


Education specialists argue that there is an urgent need to fix thecontention about funding public education. They argue that schoolresources and program significantly depend on the dollars theyreceive from the state. If funding is reduced then learning will beaffected (Smith, 2015).

Lawpractitioners, on the other hand, hold contending views concerningthe issue of financing. A section believes that the existing financeallocation system is unconstitutional, and it is imperative toreinstate the fivebillion dollars that were reduced from public learning in 2011(Smith,2015). An opposing segment sees the decrease as constitutional andthat the funding is adequate.

Stateadministrators have the view that school funding is intricate, makingit challenging to decide how much money should be spent for eachlearner or district. However, a census exists that sufficient fundingshould be prioritized (Stuz, 2015).

AT&ampT’sPosition on the Issues

AT&ampT holds the view that funding is essential. Consequently, thefive billion dollars reduction has affected the resources allocatedto public education. The company, therefore, believes thatindependent strategies should be adopted at the school level in orderto fill the gaps in finance.

Conclusionand Recommendations

HowAT&ampT Can Resolve the Problem

AsVice President of A.T&ampT, I would recommend some solutions thatwould address this issue. One approach is increasing the amount offunding currently channeled to the program. AT&ampT could work withthe current system to attract sponsors. In my opinion, thebenefactors would bring in more financial muscle into the kitty whilebenefitting the wider system in the long run.

Iwould also recommend and initiate projects that would benefit thewider community while at the same time profiting the EducationSystem. A good example is the introduction of a sports tournamentwhich seeks to raise money for schools.

Also,I propose that AT&ampT can promote fundraising projects. As VicePresident of AT&ampT, I would bring about fundraising projects thatcan increase funds allocated to schools. With this put in place,there will be an increase in funds while at the same time raising theprofile of the Education system. Fundraising projects once set upwould supply a constant flow of money needed for the smooth runningof schools.

AsVice President of AT&ampT, I would also endorse that the company cansupport public schools in coming up with self-sponsored projects ofmaking money which can be channeled to the school kitty. Inconclusion, I support financial independence as opposed todependence.


Smith,D. (2015).Texas education: top 5 issues at the Legislature. Star Telegram.

Stuz,T 2015, Texas’ school funding levels called red flag. Dallasnews.