• Uncategorized

Justice According to Plato

JusticeAccording to Plato

JusticeAccording to Plato

Conventionally, justice is theenactment and observation of what is allowed by the law. It ismaintenance of harmony and establishment of logical order. Accordingto philosopher Plato, justice is when one does the right thing andensures that it does not interfere with the peaceful coexistence withthe rest. In other terms, Plato emphasizes that true justice isfounded on the principle of non-interference. He sees Justice as apart of human virtue that helps in public cooperation (Ferrari &ampGriffith, 2000). The paper reviews Plato’s idea regarding whyjustice is best, the problems with it, and the possible solutions tosuch issues.

According to Pluto, justice isbest because it assists the society in upholding fairness throughcondemning unlawful activities. It makes lawbreakers cease theirdeeds and rewards those who act appropriately. Moreover, it is apeaceful way of creating a safe environment for people to live. Platobelieves that when human beings are given an opportunity to do badthings without any form of judgment, they would prefer the life andexploit their negative interests. In this view, justice forcesindividual to act rightfully and to have good characters. Campaigningfor the principles of moral philosophy improves human conduct. Inevery societal setup, it is a general belief that policies thateveryone accepts lead to peace. The public members live peacefullyknowing that there is justice protecting them from potential problems(Ferrari &amp Griffith, 2000). All summed up, Plato holds thatjustice is best because it brings equality between people by allowingeveryone to have the right to freedom.

The problem with Plato’s wayof perceiving justice is that it gives the power of decision everyindividual, and it sees everyone in a neutral plane. Through this, ittends to neglect the fact that certain transgressions need to limitthe offenders from the justice. As a result, it may not allow forchange in the society. Besides, while Plato’s view of justicebenefits the low abiders, it hurts the transgressors (Ferrari &ampGriffith, 2000). The implication is that in an attempt to createpartiality, justice takes advantage of one side. There is apossibility that some societies may integrate Plato’s form ofjustice into their customs, and use it to rebuke other people’sbeliefs. Justice is expensive and may not be affordable to the lessfortunate in the community (Ferrari &amp Griffith, 2000).

There are a number ofresolutions to the potential problems of Plato’s justice. Regardingits biased nature, decisions need to be made by the society as awhole and not by individuals. It can help the public to change andgrow in a more ethical way. Additionally, justice should be servedequally to everybody so that the person who is in the wrong does notfeel like he or she is being mistreated. In the case of poverty,seeking justice should be made affordable to everyone (Ferrari &ampGriffith, 2000). Communal misjudgments that are due to diverse viewsneed to be resolved by setting common rules that are fair andaccepted by everyone within the social order.

To conclude, justice isharmony, and it brings peace in the society. It entails an individualacting in a manner that does not interfere with other people. Platobelieves that justice is best because it helps in equal treatment.The main problem with justice is that it benefits one side whiledisadvantaging the other. The issue of difference in cultural beliefsmakes it difficult to execute justice (Ferrari &amp Griffith, 2000).Nonetheless, there are resolutions that need to be put in place toensure that individuals do not suffer from these problems.

Reference

Ferrari,G. R., &amp Griffith, T. (2000). Plato:`The Republic`. CambridgeUniversity Press.